I believe both approaches are legal and the idea of \"tattoo schools\" does not merit the criticism it currently gets. There are a lot of people that hit to work for a living and taking a course packed with instruction is their exclusive option
The first - tattooing should exclusive be taught the old fashioned artefact of doing a daylong constituent apprenticeship, with no clear and filled with months of cleaning the shop, being somewhat of a slave to the working artists, and sometimes being treated in a meritless manner. You can intend an idea of the process from Miami Ink. I have talked to a couple of local shop owners and not exclusive is this their method of doctrine but it usually requires a material gift from the apprentice. Eventually, the future artist is allowed to training the art and progress from there....
The second - and more underway move is to actually attend a school or take a course in this favourite art. These range from a quick 2 hebdomad course to months in duration. And yes, they are costly also, but the pore is on doctrine the art of tattooing and using a hands-on approach. I am more familiar with this method and conceive it is a straight nervy and priceless option to people searching a artefact to fortuity in to this favourite vocation. Unfortunately, whatever people are of the instrument this artefact is lame and not a reputable approach.
